Google’s ad tracking just got creepier. Here’s how to disable it

Gadget Gurus
  
Technology | The GuardianTechnology | The Guardian wrote the following post Fri, 21 Oct 2016 16:30:58 -0500

Google’s ad tracking just got creepier. Here’s how to disable it

Google in June quietly deleted a clause in its privacy settings that said it would not combine cookie information with personal information without consent

Google has changed the way it tracks users across the internet so that it can now link people’s personally identifiable information from Gmail, YouTube and other accounts with their browsing records across the web. The company had previously pledged to keep these two data sets separate to protect individuals’ privacy.

As first reported by Propublica, Google quietly updated its privacy settings in June to delete a clause that said “we will not combine DoubleClick cookie information with personally identifiable information unless we have your opt-in consent”.
Continue reading...


#Privacy #Google #Tracking #Advertising
Google Fiber is now a fiber and wireless ISP

Gadget Gurus
  
Ars TechnicaArs Technica wrote the following post Mon, 03 Oct 2016 15:50:43 -0500

Google Fiber is now a fiber and wireless ISP

Image/photo
Webpass radios on a San Francisco building. (credit: Webpass)

Google Fiber today said it has completed its acquisition of Webpass, a wireless Internet service provider that will figure prominently into its plans for deployment of high-speed Internet. But the Alphabet division is not giving up on fiber, saying it will use both wireless and fiber networks to compete against cable companies and telcos.

Google Fiber revealed its plan to buy Webpass in June, and the company said in an announcement today that Webpass "is now officially part of the Google Fiber family." The Webpass site has been updated to call the service "Webpass from Google Fiber."

"It’s been impressive to watch Webpass evolve from a boot-strapped startup to an established category leader with tens of thousands of happy customers in five major metros from San Francisco to Boston," Google Fiber President Dennis Kish wrote.

Read 4 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Image/photo Image/photo Image/photo Image/photo


#Google #Fiber #ISP #Webpass #Communications
Google to punish sites that use intrusive pop-over ads

Seth Martin
  last edited: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:10:59 -0500  
It's nice to see Google doing something positive with their power.

Ars TechnicaArs Technica wrote the following post Wed, 24 Aug 2016 08:45:28 -0500

Google to punish sites that use intrusive pop-over ads

Image/photo
(credit: Google)

Pop-up ads are annoying on desktop, but even more frustrating on mobile devices when they sometimes take over the browser. Google wants to fix that: in a blog post, the company announced that, starting next year, websites with intrusive advertisements will be punished and may be pushed down in search results.

Essentially, Google wants search results to favor sites that have the best information and the least annoying advertisements that cover up that information. "While the underlying content is present on the page and available to be indexed by Google," the blog post says, "content may be visually obscured by an interstitial. This can frustrate users because they are unable to easily access the content that they were expecting when they tapped on the search result."

Google claims these intrusive ads and interstitials create "a poorer experience" for users, particularly on mobile where space is limited by smaller screens. It's not wrong—sometimes pop-up or pop-over ads that show up on mobile websites can take up the entire display, forcing you to view them while furiously trying to find the "X" to close them. After January 10, 2017, sites that show these kinds of ads (which include content-obscuring "please subscribe to our newsletter!" pop-overs) "may not rank as highly" in search results.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs | Comments

Image/photo Image/photo Image/photo Image/photo


#Google #Advertising #AdBlock @Gadget Guru+
Mike Macgirvin
  last edited: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:34:26 -0500  
On one hand, it's a nice gesture. On the other it represents a slippery slope of Google become judge, jury, and executioner of content on the internet. It isn't a far cry from this to something like religions and political pages making viewers uncomfortable. They already decided some time ago that they were the sole judge of 'what is truth' on the internet and could drop the pagerank of anything which hadn't been successfully peer reviewed.
Seth Martin
  last edited: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:37:02 -0500  
Crap, you're right. The warm fuzzy is gone now.
Marshall Sutherland
  last edited: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 17:47:57 -0500  
Maybe they should downgrade sites with auto-playing videos.